Asymmetric Decentralization in Aceh: Institutionalization of Conflict of Interest by Elites of GAM

Bayu Satria Utama

Abstract


This article explains an institutionalization of conflicts in the implementation of special autonomy in Aceh Province. In general, one of the objectives of implementing the asymmetric decentralization policy is to resolve the problem of national integration between Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and the Government of Indonesia. However, the implementation of asymmetric decentralization in Aceh Province presents a different phenomenon. Although there is conflict resolution between GAM and the Government of Indonesia, the conflict dynamics change into a conflict of interest between GAM elites at the local level as part of the dynamics of electoral politics. This article is based on a literature study on secondary data to understand the electoral politics process has evolved to be a medium for institutionalizing conflict after the separatism movement in Aceh. This article shows that the understanding of asymmetric decentralization in Aceh Province not only served as a solution to the conflict between GAM and the Indonesian Government but also became a medium for institutionalizing conflict between GAM’s elite exponents through local elections in 2006–2017.


Keywords


conflict; elite; GAM; special autonomy; local election

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aspinall, Edward. 2007. “The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in Separatist Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (6): 950–972.

______. 2009a. “Combatan to Contractors: The Political Economy of Peace in Aceh.” Indonesia 87: 1–34.

______. 2009b. Islam and Nation: Separatist Rebellion in Aceh Indonesia. Singapore: NUS Press.

Barter, Shane Joshua. 2011. “The Free Aceh Elections? The 2009 Legislative Contest in Aceh.” Indonesia 91: 113–130.

Basyar, M. Hamdan. 2008. “Peran Elit Lokal dalam Reintegrasi Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM) Pasca MoU Helsinki.” Jurnal Penelitian Politik 5 (1): 95–107.

Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1994. Konflik dan Konflik dalam Masyarakat Industri. Depok: Rajawali Press.

Crisis Management Initiative. 2005. Memorandum of Understanding of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and The Free Aceh Movement. http://acehpeaceprocess.net/pdf/mou_final.pdf (1 December 2018).

Hartzell, Caroline and Matthew, Hoddie. 2003. “Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 318–332.

Hillman, Ben. 2012. “Power-Sharing and Political Party Engineering in Conflict-Prone Societies: The Indonesia Experiment in Aceh.” Conflict, Security and Developments 12 (2): 149–169.

Jemadu, Aleksius. 2004. “Democratisation and the Dilemma of Nation-Building in Post-Suharto Indonesia: The Case of Aceh.” Asian Etnicity 5 (3): 315–331.

Kingsbury, Damien. 2007. “The Free Aceh Movement: Islam and democratization.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 37 (2): 166–189.

KIP Aceh. 2017. Recapitulation of Vote Count Results for Gubernatorial Election at Aceh Province. https://kip.acehprov.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Lampiran-DC-1-KWK.KIP_HAL-1.pdf (accessed December 3, 2018).

Missbach, Antje. 2011. “The Acehnese Diaspora after The Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding: Return Challenges and Diasporic Post-Conflict Transformations.” Asian Etnhnicity 12 (2): 179–201.

Mietzner, Marcus. 2007. “Local Elections and Autonomy in Papua and Aceh: Mitigating or Fueling Secessionism?” Indonesia 84: 1–39.

Noor, Firman. 2008. “Nasionalisme, Demokratisasi, dan Sentimen di Indonesia: Problematika Identitas Keetnisan (Studi Kasus Aceh, Papua, Bali dan Riau).” Jurnal Penelitian Politik 5 (1): 87–93.

Nurhasim, Moch. 2009. “Transformasi Politik Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM).” Jurnal Penelitian Politik 6 (1): 85–98.

Pane, Neta S. 2001. Sejarah dan Kekuatan Gerakan Aceh Merdeka: Solusi Harapan dan Impian, Jakarta: Grasindo.

Pareto, Vilfredo. 1935. The Mind and Society. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Permana, Panji Anugrah. 2017. “Local Elite Adjusment in Indonesia’s Democratization: Case Studies of North Sumatra and East Java 1998-2013.” Dissertation, Freiburg University, Germany.

Poloma, Margaret M. 2007. Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Grafindo Persada.

Rauf, Maswadi. 2000. Konsensus Politik: Sebuah Panjajagan Teoritis, Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi.

Schulte Nordholt, Henk and Gerry van Klinken, eds. 2007. Politik Lokal di Indonesia. Jakarta: KITLV-Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Sulaiman, M. Isa, 1997. Sejarah Aceh: Sebuah Gugatan Terhadap Tradisi. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Turner, Mark. 2007. “Autonomous Regions and the Contribution of Internal Relations to Peace and Development: Mindanao, Bougainville and Aceh” Ethnopolitics 6 (1): 89–103.

Törnquist, Olle, Stanley Adi Prasetyo and Teresa Birks, eds. 2010. Aceh: The Role Democracy for Peace and Reconstruction. Jogjakarta: PCD Press.

Törnquist, Olle. 2011. “Dynamics of Peace and Democratizations. The Aceh Lessons.” Democratization 18 (3): 823–846.

Ufen, Andreas. 2007. “Elections in Aceh: New Hope for Aceh?” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 26 (1): 107–119.

Zainal, Suadi. 2015. “Transformasi Konflik Aceh dan Relasi Sosial-Politik di Era Desentralisasi.” Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi 21 (1): 81–108.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v5i1.219

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Bayu Satria Utama